Systems thinking is a way of making sense of the complexity of the world by looking at it holism and Relationalism rather than by splitting it down into its parts.[Anderson, Virginia, & Johnson, Lauren (1997). Systems Thinking Basics: From Concepts to Causal Loops. Waltham, Mass: Pegasus Comm., Inc.][Magnus Ramage and Karen Shipp. 2009. Systems Thinkers. Springer.] It has been used as a way of exploring and developing effective action in complex contexts,[ Introduction to Systems thinking. Report of GSE and GORS seminar. Civil Service Live. 3 July 2012. Government Office for Science.] enabling systems change.[Sarah York, Rea Lavi, Yehudit Judy Dori, and MaryKay Orgill Applications of Systems Thinking in STEM Education J. Chem. Educ. 2019, 96
]
/ref> Systems thinking draws on and contributes to systems theory and the Systems science.[Systemic Thinking 101 Russell L Ackoff From Mechanistic to Systemic thinking, also awal street journal (2016) Systems Thinking Speech by Dr. Russell Ackoff 1:10:57]
History
Ptolemaic system versus the Copernican system
The term system is polysemy: Robert Hooke (1674) used it in multiple senses, in his System of the World, but also in the sense of the Ptolemaic system versus the Copernican system of the relation of the planets to the fixed stars[Jon Voisey Universe Today (14 Oct 2022) Scholarly History of Ptolemy’s Star Catalog Index] which are cataloged in Hipparchus' and Almagest.[Jessica Lightfoot Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 57 (2017) 935–9672017 Hipparchus Commentary On Aratus and Eudoxus ] Hooke's claim was answered in magisterial detail by Newton's (1687) Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, Book three, The System of the World[Newton, Isaac (1687) Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica] (that is, the system of the world is a physical system).[Hooke, Robert (1674) An attempt to prove the motion of the earth from observations ]
Newton's approach, using continues to this day.[ as reprinted in Gerald Midgely (ed.) (2002) Systems thinking vol One] In brief, Newton's equations (a system of equations) have methods for equation solving.
Feedback control systems
By 1824, the Carnot cycle presented an engineering challenge, which was how to maintain the operating temperatures of the hot and cold working fluids of the physical plant.[Sadi Carnot (1824) Reflections on the Motive Power of Fire] In 1868, James Clerk Maxwell presented a framework for, and a limited solution to, the problem of controlling the rotational speed of a physical plant.[James Clerk Maxwell On Governors 12 pages] Maxwell's solution echoed James Watt centrifugal moderator for maintaining (but not enforcing) the constant speed of a physical plant (that is, Q represents a moderator, but not a governor, by Maxwell's definition).[Otto Mayr
][https://www.jstor.org/stable/229816 (1971) Maxwell and the Origins of Cybernetics] ''Isis'', Vol. '''62''', No. 4 (Winter, 1971), pp. 424-444 (21 pages)
Maxwell's approach, which linearized the equations of motion of the system, produced a tractable method of solution. Norbert Wiener identified this approach as an influence on his studies of cybernetics during World War II and Wiener even proposed treating some subsystems under investigation as black boxes.[Peter Galison (1994) The Ontology of the Enemy: Norbert Wiener and the Cybernetic Vision Critical Inquiry, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Autumn, 1994), pp. 228–266 (39 pages) JSTOR] Methods for solutions of the systems of equations then become the subject of study, as in feedback control systems, in stability theory, in constraint satisfaction problems, the unification algorithm, type inference, and so forth.
Applications
- "So, how do we change the system dynamics to produce more of what we want and less of that which is undesirable? ... MIT’s Jay Forrester likes to say that the average manager can ... guess with great accuracy where to look for leverage points—places in the system where a small change could lead to a large shift in behavior".
[Donella Meadows, (2008) ]— Donella Meadows, (2008) p.145
Characteristics
-
Subsystems serve as part of a larger system, but each comprises a system in its own right. Each frequently can be described reductively, with properties obeying its own laws, such as Newton's System of the World, in which entire , , and their satellites can be treated, sometimes in a scientific way as dynamical systems, entirely mathematically, as demonstrated by Johannes Kepler's equation (1619) for the orbit of Mars before Newton's Principia appeared in 1687.
-
are subsystems whose operation can be characterized by their inputs and outputs, without regard to further detail.
[Wiener, Norbert; , MIT Press, 1961, ISBN 0-262-73009-X, page xi]
Particular systems
-
were recognized as early as the millennia before the common era.
[Aristotle, Politics][JS Maloy (2009) The Aristotelianism of Locke's Politics Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 70, No. 2 (April 2009), pp. 235–257 (23 pages)]
-
Biological systems were recognized in Aristotle's lagoon ca. 350 BCE.
[Aristotle, History of Animals]
-
were recognized by 1776.
[Adam Smith (1776) The Wealth of Nations Book IV refers to commercial, and mercantile systems, as well as to systems of political enonomy]
-
were recognized by the 19th and 20th centuries of the common era.
[Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism][Talcott Parsons, The Structure of Social Action]
-
were developed in World War II in subsystem fashion; they were made up of transmitter, receiver, power supply, and signal processing subsystems, to defend against airborne attacks.
[MIT Radiation Laboratory, MIT Radiation Laboratory Series, 28 volumes]
-
Dynamical systems of ordinary differential equations were shown to exhibit stability theory given a suitable Lyapunov control function by Aleksandr Lyapunov in 1892.
[Richard Pates (2021) What is a Lyapunov function]
-
Thermodynamic systems were treated as early as the eighteenth century, in which it was discovered that heat could be created without limit, but that for , laws of thermodynamics could be formulated.
[ 272 pages.] Ilya Prigogine (1980) has identified situations in which systems far from equilibrium can exhibit stable behavior;[Glansdorff, P., Prigogine, I. (1971). Thermodynamic Theory of Structure, Stability and Fluctuations, London: Wiley-Interscience ] once a Lyapunov function has been identified, future and past can be distinguished, and scientific activity can begin.
Systems far from equilibrium
Living systems are resilient, and are far from equilibrium. [[Homeostasis]] is the analog to equilibrium, for a living system; the concept was described in 1849, and the term was coined in 1926.
Resilient systems are self-organizing;[H T Odum [https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.242.4882.1132 (25 Nov 1988) Self-Organization, Transformity and Information] ''Science'' Vol '''242''', Issue 4882 pp. 1132–1139 as reprinted by Gerald Midgley ed. (2002), ''Systems Thinking'' vol ''2'']
The scope of functional controls is [[hierarchical|Hierarchy]], in a resilient system.
Frameworks and methodologies
Frameworks and methodologies for systems thinking include:
-
Critical systems heuristics:
in particular, there can be twelve boundary categories for the systems when organizing one's thinking and actions.
-
Critical systems thinking, including the E P I C approach.
-
DSRP, a framework for systems thinking that attempts to generalise all other approaches.
-
Ontology engineering of representation, formal naming and definition of categories, and the properties and the relations between concepts, data, and entities.
-
Soft systems methodology, including the CATWOE approach and rich pictures.
-
Systemic design, for example using the double diamond approach.
-
System dynamics of stocks, flows, and internal feedback loops.
-
Viable system model: uses 5 subsystems.
See also
Notes
Sources
-
Russell L. Ackoff (1968) "General Systems Theory and Systems Research Contrasting Conceptions of Systems Science." in: Views on a General Systems Theory: Proceedings from the Second System Symposium, Mihajlo D. Mesarovic (ed.).
-
A.C. Ehresmann, J.-P. Vanbremeersch (1987) Hierarchical evolutive systems: A mathematical model for complex systems" Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 13–50
-
NJTA Kramer & J de Smit (1977) Systems thinking: Concepts and Notions, Springer. 148 pages
-
A. H. Louie (November 1983) " Categorical system theory" Bulletin of Mathematical Biology volume 45, pages 1047–1072
-
DonellaMeadows.org Systems Thinking Resources
-
Gerald Midgley (ed.) (2002) Systems Thinking, SAGE Publications. 4 volume set: 1,492 pages List of chapter titles